gben027
All-Star
time for AD to take charge
Posts: 431
|
Post by gben027 on Aug 4, 2004 2:51:26 GMT -5
It already has every division besides the AFC South and North, and those will be added each in the next two days, so check back for those. Go to this link to see the ratings, any thoughts on who's too high or who's too low? sports.ign.com/articles/535/535514p1.html
|
|
|
Post by finsrule84 on Aug 4, 2004 21:04:43 GMT -5
vick is a 92. that isnt right he should be a 96 or 97. hes the entire falcons team without him they would get the first pick in the draft. with him they are playoff contenders
|
|
|
Post by GTownWarHawks on Aug 4, 2004 22:17:45 GMT -5
They did that cause he was hurt last year
|
|
gben027
All-Star
time for AD to take charge
Posts: 431
|
Post by gben027 on Aug 7, 2004 14:12:25 GMT -5
Holmes as good as Tomlinson at 98? I think not.
|
|
|
Post by GTownWarHawks on Aug 7, 2004 20:27:04 GMT -5
Why do you even care about ratings if your good enough and play at hardest level they don't matter
|
|
|
Post by GTownWarHawks on Aug 7, 2004 20:28:05 GMT -5
Comes out on Thursday by me but I have it saved for me so We get it Monday
|
|
|
Post by GTownWarHawks on Aug 9, 2004 14:31:55 GMT -5
I get it today
|
|
|
Post by BrewCityBuck on Aug 10, 2004 12:39:34 GMT -5
And the ESPN ratings are bad? Cletious Hunt, a 90? Nail'' Diggs a 85? Grady Jackson a 89? What the hell?
|
|
|
Post by GTownWarHawks on Aug 10, 2004 14:02:21 GMT -5
I have the game right now Babby
|
|
|
Post by BrewCityBuck on Aug 11, 2004 15:04:39 GMT -5
Baby. And Al Harris is not 85. Rediculous ratings. I almost prefer ESPN's.
|
|
bob
Rookie
Posts: 2
|
Post by bob on Aug 16, 2004 1:21:24 GMT -5
Are you saying these packers ratings are over or under what they should be? I think Walker is definitely under. He is coming out as the packers leading receiver. Ahman Green, as the 2nd leading rusher, should be over 95 too i think. Favre, no question. The guy is really the best qb out there, even with last season being sub par. His throwing stats are significantly lowered. All in all i just dont understand why such a low average for defense. i know they arent great. lots of bs ratings though. patriots suck and they are so inflated, they just have been playing well, none of there players cept seymour and law deserve the ratings
|
|
|
Post by PJ520 on Aug 16, 2004 1:23:15 GMT -5
Are you saying these packers ratings are over or under what they should be? I think Walker is definitely under. He is coming out as the packers leading receiver. Ahman Green, as the 2nd leading rusher, should be over 95 too i think. Favre, no question. The guy is really the best qb out there, even with last season being sub par. His throwing stats are significantly lowered. All in all i just dont understand why such a low average for defense. i know they arent great. lots of bs ratings though. patriots suck and they are so inflated, they just have been playing well, none of there players cept seymour and law deserve the ratings I also thought the Panthers had some inflated ratings.
|
|
bob
Rookie
Posts: 2
|
Post by bob on Aug 16, 2004 1:45:11 GMT -5
not to mention whoever made jamal lewis a 97 should be shot. i know im being a hypocrite saying green should be higher even though this guys had 2000 yards but he was lucky. he went against the browns, of course he'll get 295 yards on a good day
|
|
|
Post by ViNSaNiTy15UnC9 on Aug 16, 2004 2:17:13 GMT -5
Only thing that matters is that these ratings are 50x better then ESPN's ratings.
|
|
|
Post by bigjohn7056 on Aug 16, 2004 2:38:17 GMT -5
William Bartee rated as an 80, Ryan Simms is an 86, Mike Maslowski an 85, and Morten Anderson kicking power 85?
|
|