|
|
Post by huskersrule01 on Oct 24, 2004 15:42:32 GMT -5
RANK TEAM RECORD PTS PVS
1. USC (49) 7-0 1,513 1
2. Oklahoma (11) 7-0 1,469 2
3. Miami (1) 6-0 1,380 3
4. Auburn 8-0 1,358 4
5. Florida State 6-1 1,218 5
6. Wisconsin 8-0 1,152 7
7. Georgia 6-1 1,127 6
8. California 5-1 1,066 8
9. Texas 6-1 1,032 9
10. Utah 7-0 1,001 10
11. Michigan 7-1 970 11
12. Tennessee 6-1 864 13
13. West Virginia 6-1 738 14
14. Virginia 6-1 660 15
15. Boise State 7-0 638 16
16. Louisville 5-1 582 18
17. Texas A&M 6-1 503 20
18. LSU 5-2 477 17
19. Purdue 5-2 457 12
20. Oklahoma State 6-1 415 21
21. Arizona State 6-1 346 23
22. Virginia Tech 5-2 338 22
23. Minnesota 6-2 176 NR
24. Iowa 5-2 89 NR
25. Southern Miss 5-1 52 NR
OTHERS RECEIVING VOTES
Northern Illinois 30, South Carolina 27, N.C. State 19, Boston College 18, Georgia Tech 17, Florida 14, Texas Tech 13, Bowling Green 12, Notre Dame 11, Missouri 11, UAB 9, Alabama 8, Navy 5, TEXAS ELPASO 3, Ohio State 3, Marshall 2, Pittsburgh 1, UCLA 1, NotreDame 0.
DROPPED FROM RANKINGS
Florida 19, Texas Tech 24, NotreDame 25.
|
|
UTE
Veteran
Posts: 72
|
Post by UTE on Oct 25, 2004 22:29:07 GMT -5
RANK TEAM RECORD PTS PVS 1. USC (49) 7-0 1,513 1 2. Oklahoma (11) 7-0 1,469 2 3. Miami (1) 6-0 1,380 3 4. Auburn 8-0 1,358 4 5. Florida State 6-1 1,218 5 6. Wisconsin 8-0 1,152 7 7. Georgia 6-1 1,127 6 8. California 5-1 1,066 8 9. Texas 6-1 1,032 9 10. Utah 7-0 1,001 10 11. Michigan 7-1 970 11 12. Tennessee 6-1 864 13 13. West Virginia 6-1 738 14 14. Virginia 6-1 660 15 15. Boise State 7-0 638 16 16. Louisville 5-1 582 18 17. Texas A&M 6-1 503 20 18. LSU 5-2 477 17 19. Purdue 5-2 457 12 20. Oklahoma State 6-1 415 21 21. Arizona State 6-1 346 23 22. Virginia Tech 5-2 338 22 23. Minnesota 6-2 176 NR 24. Iowa 5-2 89 NR 25. Southern Miss 5-1 52 NR OTHERS RECEIVING VOTES Northern Illinois 30, South Carolina 27, N.C. State 19, Boston College 18, Georgia Tech 17, Florida 14, Texas Tech 13, Bowling Green 12, Notre Dame 11, Missouri 11, UAB 9, Alabama 8, Navy 5, TEXAS ELPASO 3, Ohio State 3, Marshall 2, Pittsburgh 1, UCLA 1, NotreDame 0. DROPPED FROM RANKINGS Florida 19, Texas Tech 24, NotreDame 25. what a bunch of horse shit..we are 9 spots too low |
|
|
|
Post by huskersrule01 on Oct 26, 2004 0:06:10 GMT -5
what a bunch of horse shit..we are 9 spots too low Actaully you are closer to 9 spots too high right now. And stop saying the same thing on every thread that Utah should be #1. Yes, Utah is good but they are not a top 15 team |
|
UTE
Veteran
Posts: 72
|
Post by UTE on Oct 26, 2004 0:13:10 GMT -5
Actaully you are closer to 9 spots too high right now. And stop saying the same thing on every thread that Utah should be #1. Yes, Utah is good but they are not a top 15 team you are dillusional, A&M is 17 and we totally kicked their @$$. Was not even close, and they are probably the 2nd best team in the big 12 |
|
|
|
Post by huskersrule01 on Oct 26, 2004 0:18:51 GMT -5
you are dillusional, A&M is 17 and we totally kicked their @$$. Was not even close, and they are probably the 2nd best team in the big 12 A&M played terrible in their first game of the season and if they played now it would be a very close game and A&m is not the 2nd best team in the Big 12 |
|
UTE
Veteran
Posts: 72
|
Post by UTE on Oct 26, 2004 0:23:08 GMT -5
A&M played terrible in their first game of the season and if they played now it would be a very close game and A&m is not the 2nd best team in the Big 12 Thats just whinning and usuing excuses. We would beat A&M just as bad if not worse now. |
|
|
|
Post by huskersrule01 on Oct 26, 2004 0:32:20 GMT -5
Thats just whinning and usuing excuses. We would beat A&M just as bad if not worse now. Maybe they would still beat A&m but they still would get beat by all the top teams in the rankings. |
|
UTE
Veteran
Posts: 72
|
Post by UTE on Oct 26, 2004 0:41:06 GMT -5
your wrong again
|
|
|
|
Post by huskersrule01 on Oct 26, 2004 0:47:19 GMT -5
Just because you come from nowhere and have a good season doesnt mean that you are good enough yet to compete with the top teams in the nation. Not to mention, if you played in a good conference where you play more than 1 team that is in the top 50 teams in Div 1, there is no way you could go undefeated.
|
|
UTE
Veteran
Posts: 72
|
Post by UTE on Oct 26, 2004 1:44:35 GMT -5
we have been good for a while actually. Last year we beat Cal and Oregon and a few years ago we beat USC.
|
|
|
|
Post by YbrikTCU on Oct 26, 2004 2:12:15 GMT -5
Way to fail to even acknowledge huskersrule's argument about being at the top of a weaker conference than those ranked ahead of you.
As a fellow mid-major fan (and a student at a school that will be in the Mountain West with Utah next year), I want to see Utah do as well as they can. I think Utah is definitely not ranked too high, but might be ranked one or two spots too low. I'd put them at No. 8.
Yes, Utah is very good right now. Definitely at the top of the mid-majors. Yes, being undefeated this late in October counts for something. But look at who's ranked ahead of you: five more undefeated teams from much tougher conferences (USC, Oklahoma, Miami, Auburn and Wisconsin), three teams that have lost to one of those five (Texas, California, and Florida State), and Georgia. I'll give you Georgia, as they lost to a lower-ranked team (Tennessee), and maybe even California, who lost to overrated USC, but losing to Oklahoma and Miami, who I think are two of the best three teams in the nation (Auburn being the third), shouldn't drop top programs below a school that beats nobody. If there's anything I've learned from looking back on our season last year, it's that.
Please back up your arguments a little more solidly in the future.
My top 10 ranking, because I feel like it:
1. Oklahoma
2. Miami
3. Auburn
4. USC
5. Wisconsin
6. Florida State
7. Texas
8. Utah
9. Tennessee
10. Georgia
By the way, a few years ago, we beat USC, too. Look at us now, and look at them now.
|
|
UTE
Veteran
Posts: 72
|
Post by UTE on Oct 26, 2004 2:20:21 GMT -5
Way to fail to even acknowledge huskersrule's argument about being at the top of a weaker conference than those ranked ahead of you. As a fellow mid-major fan (and a student at a school that will be in the Mountain West with Utah next year), I want to see Utah do as well as they can. I think Utah is definitely not ranked too high, but might be ranked one or two spots too low. I'd put them at No. 8. Yes, Utah is very good right now. Definitely at the top of the mid-majors. Yes, being undefeated this late in October counts for something. But look at who's ranked ahead of you: five more undefeated teams from much tougher conferences (USC, Oklahoma, Miami, Auburn and Wisconsin), three teams that have lost to one of those five (Texas, California, and Florida State), and Georgia. I'll give you Georgia, as they lost to a lower-ranked team (Tennessee), and maybe even California, who lost to overrated USC, but losing to Oklahoma and Miami, who I think are two of the best three teams in the nation (Auburn being the third), shouldn't drop top programs below a school that beats nobody. If there's anything I've learned from looking back on our season last year, it's that. Please back up your arguments a little more solidly in the future. My top 10 ranking, because I feel like it: 1. Oklahoma 2. Miami 3. Auburn 4. USC 5. Wisconsin 6. Florida State 7. Texas 8. Utah 9. Tennessee 10. Georgia By the way, a few years ago, we beat USC, too. Look at us now, and look at them now. Actually MWC is not weak, but it will be weaker next year thanks to TCU. When did TCU beat USC..What year and what was the score? and by the way TCU was overated last year. You lost to a S Miss team we shut out! And I did not fail to acknowledge anything so your excused. Dismissed |
|
|
|
Post by YbrikTCU on Oct 26, 2004 2:23:50 GMT -5
Sun Bowl
El Paso, Texas
Dec. 31, 1998
TCU 28, USC 19
And I'm fully aware how overrated we were last year. Utah is not as overrated this year as TCU was last year, in fact, I think they're right about where they should be.
|
|
