|
Post by qcomdrj on Oct 31, 2004 16:13:58 GMT -5
1. USC (56) 8-0 1,616 1 2. OKLAHOMA (8) 8-0 1,556 2 3. AUBURN (1) 9-0 1,507 3 4. CALIFORNIA 6-1 1,362 7 5. WISCONSIN 8-0 1,359 6 6. TEXAS 7-1 1,230 8 7. UTAH 8-0 1,212 9 8. GEORGIA 7-1 1,162 10 9. TENNESSEE 7-1 1,132 11 10. MICHIGAN 8-1 1,062 12 11. MIAMI FLA 6-1 1,035 4 12. VIRGINIA 6-1 815 13 13. FLORIDA ST 6-2 803 5 14. LOUISVILLE 5-1 793 14 15. WEST VIRGINIA 7-1 754 15 16. BOISE ST 8-0 685 18 17. LSU 6-2 557 19 18. VIRGINIA TECH 6-2 515 22 19. OKLAHOMA ST 6-2 469 20 20. IOWA 6-2 416 23 21. SOUTHERN MISS 5-1 209 25 22. TEXAS A&M 6-2 206 16 23. ARIZONA ST 6-2 189 20 24. BOSTON COLLEGE 5-2 111 -- 25. TEXAS EL PASO 6-2 69 -- Others Receiving Votes: NORTHERN ILL 52, PITTSBURGH 42, TEXAS TECH 35, PURDUE 34, ALABAMA 26, UCLA 22, NAVY 20, MICHIGAN ST 11, OREGON 11, TOLEDO 11, SOUTH CAROLINA 8, OHIO ST 7, NEBRASKA 6, NOTRE DAME 5, BOWLING GREEN 4, UAB 4, NORTH CAROLINA 2, WYOMING 1
|
|
|
Post by GTownWarHawks on Oct 31, 2004 16:17:58 GMT -5
UW should be ahead of Cal. Cal lost to USC This is how it should be 1. Oklahoma 2. USC 3. Auburn 4. UW 5. Utah 6. Texas 7. Cal 8. Michigan
|
|
|
Post by qcomdrj on Oct 31, 2004 16:20:38 GMT -5
What is up with UTEP being in there? That is three Tesax teams in the top 25, 4 in the top 28. Go Texas (the state, not the university).
|
|
|
Post by soonerfan07 on Oct 31, 2004 16:26:58 GMT -5
What is up with UTEP being in there? That is three Tesax teams in the top 25, 4 in the top 28. Go Texas (the state, not the university). Texas also has a bunch of D1 college football programs
|
|
|
Post by qcomdrj on Oct 31, 2004 16:28:05 GMT -5
So does California. But I don't see 3 of them in there.
|
|
|
Post by soonerfan07 on Oct 31, 2004 16:29:31 GMT -5
So does California. But I don't see 3 of them in there. Neither do I. I never said that they did
|
|
|
Post by qcomdrj on Oct 31, 2004 16:39:00 GMT -5
My point is number of schools does not equate number of good teams. California has 7, Texas has 9. So, California has 2 teams in the top 30 or so (receiving votes), Texas has 4.
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Tennessee on Oct 31, 2004 16:41:31 GMT -5
What is up with UTEP being in there? That is three Tesax teams in the top 25, 4 in the top 28. Go Texas (the state, not the university). IMO UTEP deserves it. They are 6-2 this year.
|
|
falldown65
Veteran
I'm a complete moron.
Posts: 63
|
Post by falldown65 on Oct 31, 2004 18:20:30 GMT -5
Mike Price has done a good job turning that program around. I think I heard a stat saying that with 6 wins, they equaled the amount of wins the program had over the last 3 years.
|
|
|
Post by soonerfan07 on Oct 31, 2004 18:23:13 GMT -5
My point is number of schools does not equate number of good teams. California has 7, Texas has 9. So, California has 2 teams in the top 30 or so (receiving votes), Texas has 4. My point is that it gives states with more schools a greater chance, Oklahoma has 2 ranked schools and only 1 unranked
|
|
|
Post by PJ520 on Oct 31, 2004 18:46:02 GMT -5
How can Cal be ahead of Wisconsin? Who's undefeated? Yeah, Wisconsin. They were ahead of Cal last week but not this week? The media sucks
|
|
|
Post by GTownWarHawks on Oct 31, 2004 19:17:19 GMT -5
Like i said I hate the media
|
|
|
Post by huskersrule01 on Oct 31, 2004 23:47:27 GMT -5
It should be 1. USC 2. Oklahoma( only #2 because of close win Saturday) 3. Auburn 4. Wisconsin 5. California or Texas
|
|
|
Post by LOBOFLYER on Nov 1, 2004 4:12:32 GMT -5
IMO UTEP deserves it. They are 6-2 this year. Mike Price should be coach of the year. Yes they have equaled their win total from the last 3 years. And whats even scarier is they will probably go 9-2! The last 3 games are against SMU, Rice, and Tulsa, those 3 teams = half the wins for UTEP in the last 3 years (the other 3 were against DIV 1-A Teams)
|
|
|
Post by soonerfan07 on Nov 1, 2004 9:32:28 GMT -5
It should be 1. USC 2. Oklahoma( only #2 because of close win Saturday) 3. Auburn 4. Wisconsin 5. California or Texas When you put OU #2 because of a close win, would u normally put them #1?
|
|