|
Post by buike24blue on Sept 2, 2004 23:25:11 GMT -5
better than malik hairston although hairston will have better numbers because oregon is a weaker team in a weaker conference......crawford has hops a nice j and will become a defensive stud
|
|
SciFan
Veteran
BANNED
Posts: 124
|
Post by SciFan on Sept 3, 2004 8:59:10 GMT -5
I'm sure if Hairston was going to UK and Crawford was going to Oregon, you'd say the exact opposite since your are the epitomy of a UK HOMER!
|
|
|
Post by roy_who on Sept 3, 2004 12:22:28 GMT -5
Nah, if Hairston went to UK, he wouldn't give Crawford credit for the points he'll put up at Oregon... ;D
|
|
|
Post by hustla45 on Sept 3, 2004 13:12:12 GMT -5
I have to agree with Sci_fan in this one Buike. If you tell it, it sounds like UK has the all-world team as their starting lineup, and the all-world second team as their reserves. I think you're cool and all, but basketball does exist outside of Lexington.
|
|
|
Post by buike24blue on Sept 3, 2004 15:26:51 GMT -5
bull.....i have picked unc to win it all.....of course i know bball exists outside of lexington....i love all bball....i prefer uk and i do think uk will have a great season and lineup but the backups are only solid not excellent
|
|
|
Post by buike24blue on Sept 3, 2004 15:30:34 GMT -5
and other thing everyone on here knows that i am not a homer....i also think that while crawford is better, in my opinion, hairston will win the freshman the year award
|
|
|
Post by onecvkid on Sept 7, 2004 1:03:00 GMT -5
I'll homer out for ya.UK does have a good shot.A great amount of talent and some good leadership can go a far way.Under the wings of ole Tubby...I think it could happen.
and don't front you guys brag just as much as us....
Oh yeah,Crawford will be very real!
|
|
|
Post by onecvkid on Sept 9, 2004 3:04:36 GMT -5
better than malik hairston although hairston will have better numbers because oregon is a weaker team in a weaker conference......crawford has hops a nice j and will become a defensive stud I agree with this post. I guess we're just wrong???
|
|
|
Post by Bill4KU on Sept 9, 2004 8:50:03 GMT -5
How ya been cvkid??? It's ok, you guys brag it up all you want. It will just make Jan 9th that much sweeter.
|
|
|
Post by onecvkid on Sept 13, 2004 22:54:05 GMT -5
How ya been cvkid??? It's ok, you guys brag it up all you want. It will just make Jan 9th that much sweeter. I've been doing good man.I love the fact that KU and UK get to bump heads this season.With all the fans of both teams who participate in discussion,it should get pretty fun come the 9th...I hope we can all stay friends.j/k.How's everything with you?
|
|
|
Post by ukcatsfinal4in2005 on Sept 18, 2004 22:45:30 GMT -5
crawford is better than hairston, but not by much. cant wait for UK to beat kansas this year!
|
|
brox
Rookie
Posts: 9
|
Post by brox on Sept 28, 2004 16:46:08 GMT -5
I have not seen any recruiting website that has Crawford as a better player than Hairston. Also, UK's starting five doesnt scare me at all. Fitch, Hawkins, Daniels, Crawford, and Morris dont scare me. Who is the star that hits the big shot when they need it, and how different is this team than the one that lost to Florida A&M? Dicky V has them 3rd, I'm not sure if they are in my top 10.
I am an admitted UK hater, as my cousins are from northern Kentucky and are die-hard fans.
U-C-O-N-N....UCONN...UCONN...UCONN!!!!
|
|