|
|
Post by JaxHawk06 on Nov 2, 2004 14:59:21 GMT -5
1 vote for Bush
|
|
|
|
Post by BrewCityBuck on Nov 2, 2004 16:34:32 GMT -5
Explain what the war on terrorism is.  I sure as hell would like to know. Let's go after Saddam, North Korea, Iran, and Syria but lets forget about Saudi Arabia. I'm so tired of our leaders kissing Saudi ass because they have half the oil in the world. The 'war on terror' is a joke to me. We are wasting so much damned money in that hell called Iraq. But in the United States we have no bio/chemical plans. Our hospitals are not up to standard incase of an attack, we have no Seaport security, poor airport security, terrible chemical storage security, bad/improving homeland security, no border control..... We can attack as many countries as we want but it won't help. We need to spend all this money AT HOME. And as a last resort use bombs. The US doesn't have the manpower to keep attacking these countries, and we have little or no help. Screw the Arab countries and keep them from attacking us at home. Backround check every Islamic person to come into the US, track them. If we are real about ending terrorism we need to take our troops out of Saudi Arabia, out of the middleeast and leave it alone....The only thing that sucks about that is that the oil is all there. END TERRORISM - Take troops out of middleeast - Spend/Invest heavily into new fuel - Tighten security for reasons above - Figure how to get out of Palestine/Israel mess I'm so damned sick of this and neither John Kerry or George Bush are going to keep us safe. |
|
|
|
Post by GTownWarHawks on Nov 2, 2004 16:43:17 GMT -5
Bush or The Govenator
|
|
|
|
Post by BrewCityBuck on Nov 2, 2004 16:46:53 GMT -5
Obviously it's going to favor Bush because he shouted really loud on 9/11. I do not trust either. I picked other, again showing my 'Liberal bias'
|
|
|
|
Post by GTownWarHawks on Nov 2, 2004 16:49:30 GMT -5
Let's keep this on Terrorism please.
|
|
|
|
Post by qcomdrj on Nov 2, 2004 16:53:58 GMT -5
Bush will keep us safer in the long run with his plans implemented. Kerry will keep us safe as long as bin Laden says to, since he is trying to throw the election. As soon as he would know Kerry is in power, he would attack with much more force because he knows there would be less retaliation. Our airports are relatively safe in the commercial end. However, it wouldn't be hard for them to attack using private planes and aerosolized biological weaponry.
The CDC is very alert on the list of potential biological agents and has many lists of treatment protocols and stockpiles in case something of this nature should happen. I am not sure where you are getting your data (some liberal blog likely) but it simply isn't true. Not all of it.
We need more secure borders, but not just for terrorism, for all reasons. Liberals are less interested in securing our borders and more interested in nationalizing illegal immigrants who cross them.
We are spending/investing heavily into new fuels, simply because NASA needs better fuels. They aren't cost effective right now and aren't looking it for awhile.
There is no way for us to get out of the Palestine Israel mess. We will always be for a sovereign Israeli state, and as long as we hold that belief, certain Muslim sects will hate us. Wiping them off the face of the earth would fix that, but probably lower our international status.
If we didn't have any troops in the Middle East there would be quite a bit more terrorist groups than there are now.
You picking other doesn't show your liberal bias, but your blowing of a certain candidate up our collective butts for the last month has. Deal with it. You can't choose other now.
|
|
|
|
Post by tigerbait99 on Nov 2, 2004 18:31:20 GMT -5
5 votes for Bush!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by huskersrule01 on Nov 5, 2004 12:41:18 GMT -5
The Govenator??? He wouldnt do anything but make things worse. |
|
|
|
Post by BrewCityBuck on Nov 5, 2004 16:32:58 GMT -5
The Governator? Just because you took steriods and have a fake accent doesn't mean your tough on terror.
|
|
|
|
Post by qcomdrj on Nov 5, 2004 17:05:11 GMT -5
Fake accent? What is he faking? He grew up in Austria. That's why he can't become president. That's why some Republicans are thinking of amending The Constitution, albeit a very small minority of them. What is he faking? A South African accent? A Mexican accent?
|
|
|
|
Post by BrewCityBuck on Nov 5, 2004 17:09:50 GMT -5
Settle down QCom. I like Arnold.  |
|
|
|
Post by huskersrule01 on Nov 5, 2004 17:14:48 GMT -5
Arnold wouldnt be a good president at all, good thing he wont ever be able to unless they change the law and I really doubt it will and really hope it doesnt happen.
|
|
|
|
Post by qcomdrj on Nov 5, 2004 17:24:17 GMT -5
Settle down QCom. I like Arnold. Am I not settled? I was just trying to figure out what accent you think he is faking. He has done a remarkably good job of governing that impossible state so far though. He must have a good staff. |
|
|
|
Post by CoverCorner41 on Nov 5, 2004 20:30:22 GMT -5
I vote Bush because Kerry has the mental capacity equal to that of a blind, retarded squirell who has just been hit by a semi.
|
|
|
|
Post by BrewCityBuck on Nov 26, 2004 11:04:42 GMT -5
Mental Capacity.....haha. Funny.
|
|
I sure as hell would like to know. Let's go after Saddam, North Korea, Iran, and Syria but lets forget about Saudi Arabia. I'm so tired of our leaders kissing Saudi ass because they have half the oil in the world.
