|
Post by tigerbait99 on Sept 25, 2004 15:14:21 GMT -5
Uh... well there is no National Championship in 1-A college football. LSU won the Sugar Bowl, and thus the BCS championship. If you want to consider the BCS title to be equivalent to a national championship, fine, but don't throw a fit when not everyone agrees with that sentiment. USC and the PAC 10 agreed to the BCS system. LSU won the Sugar Bowl. Since the Sugar Bowl was the designated national championship game, LSUs title is the only legitimate one. USC won the Rose Bowl, thats it.
|
|
|
Post by tigerbait99 on Sept 25, 2004 10:25:39 GMT -5
Iowa won a national championship in 1958 too. Why wouldn't you accept the award? They felt their team deserved it and the media thought they did. 1958 Final AP Poll 1. LSU (11-0-0) 2. Iowa (8-1-1) 3. Army (8-0-1) 4. Auburn (9-0-1) 5. Oklahoma (10-1-0) 6. Air Force (9-0-2) 7. Wisconsin (7-1-1) 8. Ohio State (6-1-2) 9. Syracuse (8-2-0) 10. TCU (8-2-1)
|
|
|
Post by tigerbait99 on Sept 24, 2004 21:01:54 GMT -5
But they do control accepting the award. And it wasn't a poll that gave it to them in the 30s. The media isn't an option, and there are lots of people from USC who don't respect LSU's NC. That's why. I will now claim the following national titles for LSU. 1895 - (3-0-0) 1896 - (6-0-0) 1898 - (1-0-0) 1905 - (3-0-0) 1908 - (10-0-0) 1935 - (9-1-0) 1936 - (9-1-1) 1958 - (11-0-0) 2003 - (13-1) And I will go ahead and throw this one in too. 1918 - (0-0-0) well, we were undefeated WOOHOO! NOW WE HAVE 10! ***DOES THIS LOOK FAMILIAR USC FANS, STOP CLAIMING TITLES THAT ARE NOT ALL YOURS***
|
|
|
Post by tigerbait99 on Sept 24, 2004 12:41:45 GMT -5
Finally a chance to insult the trojans. I hate USC more than anything. They didn't win anything last year. LSU is the 1 and only NC for 2003. We won the sugar bowl (aka, the national title game.) SC simply beat Michigan in the Rose Bowl. The AP hates LSU (along with the rest of the SEC). Anyone that actually buys into that PAC-10 "Conference of Champions" thing is an idiot. The Pathetic 10 doesn't deserve to be a BCS conference.
Here is a good question for everyone. What would USCs record have been last year had they had LSUs schedule? What would USCs record be this year if they had LSUs schedule?
Interesting fact---LSUs defense held Georgia to -8 total yards in the first half of last years SEC title game. Give me an example of USC doing something similar against an equally good opponent.
LSU WOULD HAVE KILLED USC LAST YEAR. IT WOULDN'T HAVE BEEN CLOSE. THE 2005 LSU TIGERS SHOULD BE BETTER THAN LAST YEARS TEAM.
Other teams I hate: Auburn Florida Cal Arizona Arizona St (I will just go ahead and say the entire PAC-10) Texas -There are probably more, but I will go ahead and stop.
|
|
|
Post by tigerbait99 on Sept 25, 2004 15:20:35 GMT -5
you don't outplay a team and lose by 25, it just doesn't work that way I am going by the stats, not the score. Houston made some big mistakes, that is the only reason they lost by that much.
|
|
|
Post by tigerbait99 on Sept 24, 2004 12:51:17 GMT -5
31-13 final. Ouch. Oh well, we knew it was gonna happen like that. I was at the game last night, and it was much closer than the score indicated. Houston really outplayed Miami, but made a lot of mistakes and had bad field position. Miami couldn't throw the ball, and didn't always have success running it either. The Hurricane D was poor at best, and gave up on a couple of big 3rd downs. UH QB Kevin Kolb some real improvement over a couple of weeks ago, and the cougar D actually showed some signs of life. If miami plays like that again they will get killed in the ACC. UH needs to keep up that level of play, and they might pull some upsets in CUSA.
|
|
|
Post by tigerbait99 on Sept 21, 2004 23:00:43 GMT -5
On saturday Sam Houston State upset 1AA #1 Montana! Woohoo!!!Go Sam Houston!!!!
|
|
|
Post by tigerbait99 on Sept 21, 2004 22:32:00 GMT -5
I will stick with Utah. They have really impressed up to this point.
|
|
|
Post by tigerbait99 on Sept 21, 2004 21:14:46 GMT -5
1. Utah 2. Boise 3. Fresno 4. Louisville 5. Southern Miss 6. Memphis
|
|
|
Post by tigerbait99 on Sept 25, 2004 18:07:11 GMT -5
Who would replace Arkansas in the SEC? If all the crappy BCS schools went to one big midmajor it would be cool. Then they could have winning seasons. I'm talking about Vandy, Baylor, Kansas, Kentucky, Duke (ok, thats a stretch for them to win), Northwestern, [glow=red,2,300]all of the Pac10[/glow], etc. WELL PUT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by tigerbait99 on Sept 22, 2004 19:57:12 GMT -5
I will stick with Baylor.
|
|
|
Post by tigerbait99 on Sept 21, 2004 21:16:24 GMT -5
Baylor will win it.
|
|
|
Post by tigerbait99 on Sept 24, 2004 21:30:04 GMT -5
I would like to see your 1-117 because there are a few teams not on your top 40 that should be and teams in your top 40 that should not be there. Who do you think is missing?
|
|
|
Post by tigerbait99 on Sept 22, 2004 16:05:34 GMT -5
Does anyone want me to start posting 1-117.
|
|
|
Post by tigerbait99 on Sept 21, 2004 22:28:45 GMT -5
Formula components: - AP Poll Ranking - Coaches Poll Ranking - My own personal rankings - My SOS rankings - collegebcs.com SOS rankings - Quality wins (based on the average of the AP and Coaches poll rankings) - Number of home games - Number of road games (*includes games on a neutral site) - Margin of vicotry - Margin of loss - Timing of big games (playing ranked teams on consecutive weeks earns a larger point value) - Record I will not go into all of the percentages and numbers becuase it would take me too long. However, these are the components that I use.
|
|